This article explores the global risks associated with a hypothetical Ukrainian invasion of Russia, supported by NATO allies such as the U.S. and the U.K., through offensive and defensive realist frameworks. Offensive realism suggests NATO’s backing aims to assert dominance and weaken Russian influence, using advanced weaponry like the Storm Shadow missile as a show of power. Defensive realism, conversely, interprets Russia’s response as a rational defence against perceived Western encirclement, leading to a potential security dilemma. The study highlights the dangers of military escalation, where NATO’s actions could provoke retaliatory measures from Russia, potentially igniting a global conflict. It underscores the need for diplomatic measures to prevent escalation and maintain global stability.

Nepotism poses serious risks to democratic values. This practice can severely undermine democratic principles by compromising merit-based selection processes, eroding public trust, and reinforcing systemic inequalities. While recent events in Indonesia provide a contemporary example of nepotism’s potential impact, the issue extends beyond any single case, reflecting broader challenges faced by democracies worldwide. It becomes clear that addressing this issue requires a commitment to transparent, merit-based systems and reforms to uphold democratic principles.